<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Multithreaded Encryption and Compression	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/</link>
	<description>Networking, Systems Design, and Disaster Recovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 22:03:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tracking Emails in Postfix Logs &#124; KrazyWorks		</title>
		<link>https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-274851</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracking Emails in Postfix Logs &#124; KrazyWorks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 22:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krazyworks.com/?p=15355#comment-274851</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] GNU Parallel [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] GNU Parallel [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Finding Prime Numbers &#124; KrazyWorks		</title>
		<link>https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-274819</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finding Prime Numbers &#124; KrazyWorks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 18:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krazyworks.com/?p=15355#comment-274819</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] may get even better time using parallel and passing multiple arguments per line (option -N). The advantage of parallel over xargs in this [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] may get even better time using parallel and passing multiple arguments per line (option -N). The advantage of parallel over xargs in this [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Parallel MySQL Queries &#124; KrazyWorks		</title>
		<link>https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-274813</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parallel MySQL Queries &#124; KrazyWorks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 05:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krazyworks.com/?p=15355#comment-274813</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] some time now I&#8217;ve been playing with GNU Parallel and it is the perfect choice for the job. Without further ado, here&#8217;s a quick practical [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] some time now I&#8217;ve been playing with GNU Parallel and it is the perfect choice for the job. Without further ado, here&#8217;s a quick practical [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GNU Parallel Notes &#124; KrazyWorksKrazyWorks		</title>
		<link>https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-274804</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GNU Parallel Notes &#124; KrazyWorksKrazyWorks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2015 23:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krazyworks.com/?p=15355#comment-274804</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] wrote about GNU Parallel in the past and mentioned its usefulness when working with a large number of [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] wrote about GNU Parallel in the past and mentioned its usefulness when working with a large number of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: OleTange		</title>
		<link>https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-274774</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OleTange]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 06:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krazyworks.com/?p=15355#comment-274774</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-274773&quot;&gt;igor444&lt;/a&gt;.

Core detection is not tested very well on SPARC: I do not have access to a T4-2, so I rely on users to provide improvements. Feel free to do so.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-274773">igor444</a>.</p>
<p>Core detection is not tested very well on SPARC: I do not have access to a T4-2, so I rely on users to provide improvements. Feel free to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: igor444		</title>
		<link>https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-274773</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[igor444]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krazyworks.com/?p=15355#comment-274773</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-274771&quot;&gt;OleTange&lt;/a&gt;.

Point taken on the double-quotes. Thanks. 


I noticed on SPARC T4-2 parallel launches 16 threads with or without the --use-cpus-instead-of-cores. I would have expected 128 - the number of vcores.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-274771">OleTange</a>.</p>
<p>Point taken on the double-quotes. Thanks. </p>
<p>I noticed on SPARC T4-2 parallel launches 16 threads with or without the &#8211;use-cpus-instead-of-cores. I would have expected 128 &#8211; the number of vcores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: OleTange		</title>
		<link>https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-274771</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OleTange]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2014 09:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krazyworks.com/?p=15355#comment-274771</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-274770&quot;&gt;igor444&lt;/a&gt;.

Being the author of GNU Parallel I see myself as a more authoritative source than admin-magazine. GNU Parallel _used_ to default to 9 processes. It was changed in 20110122 after a user vote.


While it is good practice to enclose VARIABLES in double quotes, that is not the case with {} (which is not a variable but a replacement string).


GNU Parallel deals with the spacing, so putting &quot; around is always unneeded and can cause harm in some situations. Here for example: parallel echo &#039;a &quot;{}&quot;&#039; ::: &#039;a b&#039;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-274770">igor444</a>.</p>
<p>Being the author of GNU Parallel I see myself as a more authoritative source than admin-magazine. GNU Parallel _used_ to default to 9 processes. It was changed in 20110122 after a user vote.</p>
<p>While it is good practice to enclose VARIABLES in double quotes, that is not the case with {} (which is not a variable but a replacement string).</p>
<p>GNU Parallel deals with the spacing, so putting &#8221; around is always unneeded and can cause harm in some situations. Here for example: parallel echo &#8216;a &#8220;{}&#8221;&#8216; ::: &#8216;a b&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: igor444		</title>
		<link>https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-274770</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[igor444]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2014 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krazyworks.com/?p=15355#comment-274770</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-274768&quot;&gt;OleTange&lt;/a&gt;.

GNU parallel defaults to 9 threads if -j is not specified. See here: http://www.admin-magazine.com/HPC/Articles/GNU-Parallel-Multicore-at-the-Command-Line-with-GNU-Parallel


An alternative is to specify &quot;-j +0&quot;, allowing parallel to automatically determine the number of core. However, this doesn&#039;t always work on Linux and never works on SPARC Solaris.


It is a good practice to enclose variables in double quotes, thus saving yourself a lot of trouble when the variable&#039;s value happens to contain a space or a special character.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-274768">OleTange</a>.</p>
<p>GNU parallel defaults to 9 threads if -j is not specified. See here: <a href="http://www.admin-magazine.com/HPC/Articles/GNU-Parallel-Multicore-at-the-Command-Line-with-GNU-Parallel" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.admin-magazine.com/HPC/Articles/GNU-Parallel-Multicore-at-the-Command-Line-with-GNU-Parallel</a></p>
<p>An alternative is to specify &#8220;-j +0&#8221;, allowing parallel to automatically determine the number of core. However, this doesn&#8217;t always work on Linux and never works on SPARC Solaris.</p>
<p>It is a good practice to enclose variables in double quotes, thus saving yourself a lot of trouble when the variable&#8217;s value happens to contain a space or a special character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: OleTange		</title>
		<link>https://www.krazyworks.com/multithreaded-encryption-and-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-274768</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OleTange]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 23:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krazyworks.com/?p=15355#comment-274768</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[GNU Parallel defaults to -j number_of_cores, so you do no need that. Also you do not need &quot; around {}.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GNU Parallel defaults to -j number_of_cores, so you do no need that. Also you do not need &#8221; around {}.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
