Was that question just as Fair as: Bush went into Iraq to Steal the oil so him and Dick Cheney could make Billions!!

Of course my Favorite: 911 was a Set-up by the Bush administration.

I would like one single Democrat say all of this is nothing but Political BS that both sides fling around.

Is there one that has the political guts to say that?

BQ) Shouldn’t the top bosses in the BCCI be the former players and businessmen like Srinivasan and others just the financial and business advisers?
@Bill, Jadeja wasn’t that bad in the second match too. In a low scoring match, economy rate is what counts and he definitely stopped the runs. Besides, he made valuable runs at the lower order. Having said that, I am still not in favor of Jadeja.

Please only answer this if you agree that AGW is real, is likely to be harmful, and could be slowed or stopped by most of the following methods (or, at least, are willing to pretend that you do). This is for people looking for real solutions, not the “it’s all a hoax” crowd.

In broad outline, I only see a few basic ways to deal with AGW:

1. Carbon taxes. Apply a tax and/or tariff on fossil carbon, and/or anything made using fossil carbon.

2. Cap-and-trade, or something similar. Restrictions on CO2 emissions from fossil sources (and other greenhouse gas emissions), preferably with some provisions to let low-producing companies sell or trade their excess allotment to high-producing companies to reduce overall economic damage, but without requiring any specific pattern or type of CO2 reductions (eg banning a particular fuel)

3. Direct behavioral regulation. As people are unlikely to voluntarily make major lifestyle changes in large enough quantity without something directly pushing them, this would be either a. incentives for desired behaviors (for example, tax cuts for installing solar panels), or b. laws restricting specific undesirable behaviors (for example, limiting the sale of cars). It could also involve either i. end consumers (for example, regulating miles driven by individual citizens), or ii. businesses (for example, requiring power companies to phase out coal power plants).

4. Geoengineering. Targeted, man-made efforts to capture excess atmospheric CO2, and/or reduce global warming in other ways (for example, by increasing albedo)

5. Adaptation. Rather than slowing or stopping AGW, adjust our lifestyles, city locations, agriculture, transit, et cetera to tolerate new conditions. This would likely involve massive migrations away from new deserts, flooded coasts, and the like, and might also involve draconian population control measures to limit humanity to the Earth’s new carrying capacity.

What do you think are the potential merits or flaws of any or all of the various approaches? Which approach or approaches do you favor? Did I miss any?

But solar energy was a legitimately good idea.

Why did Reagan remove the solar panels (at TAXPAYER EXPENSE, no less…) that Carter had previously installed on top of the White House?

What was the point?

What did Reagan actually do to decrease America’s dependency on Mideast oil – anythng?

I was searching for something lika that but I dont find nothing.

Thank you!

and now we are slaves to the upper class

how have the Republicans been allowed to do this

Im looking for a good Multi Server Control & Administration Panel that i can use with Wamp

All the ones i find only work on linux servers not windows

Any help would be great

Thanks all